Agreement Philippines

As a large-scale agreement, the free trade agreement covers trade in goods, trade in services, investment, competition, protection of intellectual property rights, public procurement, trade and sustainable development. In the area of merchandise trade, EFTA removes all tariffs on industrial products from the time the agreement comes into force, while the Philippines will gradually reduce or eliminate its tariffs on the vast majority of these products. The parties recognize that economic development, social development and environmental protection are interdependent. In Chapter 11, they reaffirm their commitment to multilateral contracts and principles in the environment and work and commit to a level of protection by recognizing the right of each party to set its own level of environmental and labour protection. Arbitration procedures do not apply to this chapter. Negotiations for a trade and investment agreement between the EU and the Philippines began on 22 December 2015. The aim is to conclude an agreement covering a wide range of issues, including tariffs, non-tariff barriers, trade in services and investment, as well as the trade aspects of public procurement, intellectual property, competition and sustainable development. The agreement contains various procedural safeguards to protect due process rights and prohibit dual threats. [2] [VIII 2-6] The agreement also exempts Filipino personnel from visa formalities and ensures expedited entry and exit; [2] [IV] requires the United States to accept Philippine driver`s licenses; [2] [V] authorizes Philippine personnel to carry weapons to U.S.

military facilities during deployment; [2] [VI] provides for exemptions and import/export duties for Filipino personnel; [2] [X, XI] requires the United States to provide medical care to Filipino personnel; [2] [XIV] and exempts Philippine vehicles, ships and aircraft from landing or port charges, shipping or overflight charges, road tolls or any other charge for the use of U.S. military installations. [2] [XV] The second challenge, Suzette Nicolas y Sombilon Vs. Alberto Romulo, et al. / Jovito R. Salonga, et al. Vs. Daniel Smith, et al. / Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, et al.

Vs. President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, et al. was decided on February 11, 2009, again by the Supreme Court. In deciding this second challenge, Court 9-4 (with two judges who inhibit) ruled that «the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) concluded on February 10, 1998 between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States is in accordance with the Constitution … The decision continued, particularly with respect to the subic Rape case, «…