The children looked at each other in the mirror. The children were looking at each other in the mirror. [Watch takes a direct object; that`s why the participatory is consistent with it.] For a long time, banning students from the past French participatory agreement was not as difficult as it was first. There are two basic rules, each with a nuance: juggling the right conjugations for the French past — and all the good verbal agreements — can make the memory of past events even more painful. Participation of the French past: The French preposition verbs have no direct object, but indirect, so no agreement: I wrote to him (also of him is a girl, because the verb is written) If you express something in the past tense by the past composed, they need a verb helping between the subject and the past participating in the main verb. The most common option is to have (to) have the verb helping. In reality, speakers do not tend to add agreements with having in daily speech. They probably only make these agreements by speaking carefully and thinking about the written language when they speak. So if they don`t read in a scenario, people would generally say: in our example, the word magpie in French is feminine, so when it becomes the pronoun «the» or the front of the verb, we must add a final «e» to the former participant. Remember, not all French verbs need to be consistent with the subject! In fact, most of them are not. All you have to do is use the following conjugation tactic when you are talking about the compound past (past tense) and using the «tre» as a helping verb. Of course, there are a whole series of cases involving previous French holdings that require special attention, but these are not exactly exceptions; instead, it`s more like little tricks where you have to think a little about what is the element of the sentence cod or not, or if the agreement makes sense.
There is no doubt that French is a language that is primarily motivated by importance. Hi, and welcome to our lesson on the past French participatory agreement, on Language Easy! I remember seeing my teacher insisting at school. What is interesting is that it requires a little thought, not just the application of rules. In general, the current participant does not agree with the use of having. In the following sentence, for example, the subject is the female plural and the direct object (of the gifts) is plural male, but no match is added to the old participant purchased: First, the question «what». If we say that the past participant is «agree,» we think that, just like a normal adjective, it changes shape depending on whether it is masculine or feminine, singular or plural. Specifically, the French verb agreement is tense in the past. Rule: If the object (here the pronoun) is in front of the verb, you must match it with the former participant.
(the agreement is not with the object, but with the direct object) The verbs and themes correspond in terms of gender and number. You may have already noticed this trend in the three examples above. As I have already explained, the verbs of the use of being in the compound past must correspond to the subject, both in number and in sex.